Вот и в Америке свой Кордонский объявился, как же без этого
The other obstacle to change is that colleges and universities are self-regulating or, in academic parlance, governed by peer review. While trustees and administrations theoretically have some oversight responsibility, in practice, departments operate independently. To complicate matters further, once a faculty member has been granted tenure he is functionally autonomous. Many academics who cry out for the regulation of financial markets vehemently oppose it in their own departments.
If American higher education is to thrive in the 21st century, colleges and universities, like Wall Street and Detroit, must be rigorously regulated and completely restructured. The long process to make higher learning more agile, adaptive and imaginative can begin with six major steps:
1. Restructure the curriculum, beginning with graduate programs and proceeding as quickly as possible to undergraduate programs. The division-of-labor model of separate departments is obsolete and must be replaced with a curriculum structured like a web or complex adaptive network. Responsible teaching and scholarship must become cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural.
2. Abolish permanent departments, even for undergraduate education, and create problem-focused programs. These constantly evolving programs would have sunset clauses, and every seven years each one should be evaluated and either abolished, continued or significantly changed. It is possible to imagine a broad range of topics around which such zones of inquiry could be organized: Mind, Body, Law, Information, Networks, Language, Space, Time, Media, Money, Life and Water.
Consider, for example, a Water program. In the coming decades, water will become a more pressing problem than oil, and the quantity, quality and distribution of water will pose significant scientific, technological and ecological difficulties as well as serious political and economic challenges. These vexing practical problems cannot be adequately addressed without also considering important philosophical, religious and ethical issues. After all, beliefs shape practices as much as practices shape beliefs.
A Water program would bring together people in the humanities, arts, social and natural sciences [последовательность перечисления специалистов по воде просто умиляет!] with representatives from professional schools like medicine, law, business, engineering, social work, theology and architecture [и тут инженеров где-то скромно с серединке приткнул; хорошо хоть совсем не забыл]. Through the intersection of multiple perspectives and approaches, new theoretical insights will develop and unexpected practical solutions will emerge.
. . .
Mark C. Taylor is the Chair of the Department of Religion. A leading figure in debates about post-modernism, Taylor has written on topics ranging from philosophy, religion, literature, art and architecture to education, media, science, technology and economics.
Постмодернист, понимаешь. А то трудно догадаться. Columbia, между прочим, не хухры-мухры. Колледжи, паразиты, self-regulating и governed каким-то peer review, да еще и operate independently. Доколе терпеть можно!
I can easily imagine a water program led by a Professor of Religion and post-modernism. Shiny exciting future! Воды будет - хоть залейся.
via![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
aron_turgenev
If American higher education is to thrive in the 21st century, colleges and universities, like Wall Street and Detroit, must be rigorously regulated and completely restructured. The long process to make higher learning more agile, adaptive and imaginative can begin with six major steps:
1. Restructure the curriculum, beginning with graduate programs and proceeding as quickly as possible to undergraduate programs. The division-of-labor model of separate departments is obsolete and must be replaced with a curriculum structured like a web or complex adaptive network. Responsible teaching and scholarship must become cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural.
2. Abolish permanent departments, even for undergraduate education, and create problem-focused programs. These constantly evolving programs would have sunset clauses, and every seven years each one should be evaluated and either abolished, continued or significantly changed. It is possible to imagine a broad range of topics around which such zones of inquiry could be organized: Mind, Body, Law, Information, Networks, Language, Space, Time, Media, Money, Life and Water.
Consider, for example, a Water program. In the coming decades, water will become a more pressing problem than oil, and the quantity, quality and distribution of water will pose significant scientific, technological and ecological difficulties as well as serious political and economic challenges. These vexing practical problems cannot be adequately addressed without also considering important philosophical, religious and ethical issues. After all, beliefs shape practices as much as practices shape beliefs.
A Water program would bring together people in the humanities, arts, social and natural sciences [последовательность перечисления специалистов по воде просто умиляет!] with representatives from professional schools like medicine, law, business, engineering, social work, theology and architecture [и тут инженеров где-то скромно с серединке приткнул; хорошо хоть совсем не забыл]. Through the intersection of multiple perspectives and approaches, new theoretical insights will develop and unexpected practical solutions will emerge.
. . .
Mark C. Taylor is the Chair of the Department of Religion. A leading figure in debates about post-modernism, Taylor has written on topics ranging from philosophy, religion, literature, art and architecture to education, media, science, technology and economics.
Постмодернист, понимаешь. А то трудно догадаться. Columbia, между прочим, не хухры-мухры. Колледжи, паразиты, self-regulating и governed каким-то peer review, да еще и operate independently. Доколе терпеть можно!
I can easily imagine a water program led by a Professor of Religion and post-modernism. Shiny exciting future! Воды будет - хоть залейся.
via
aron_turgenev
no subject
no subject
no subject
Я очень позитивно отношусь к либерал артс, даже пара совместных статей в ревью лежит. Если они владеют численными методами, то таким людям цены нет. Но этот теолог - нечто удивительное.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(извиняюсь за банальности, устала, видно :)